The myriad marketing automation companies operating today are doing a great job answering half of the lead scoring question: How “engaged” is the prospect?
However, they are generally not addressing the other half, which is arguably even more important: Is the prospect a good fit?
Certain sales vice presidents state emphatically that lead scores don’t work. Businesses are moving from automation company to automation company. Some are eschewing the leading marketing automation vendors’ tools in favor of totally new lead scoring methodologies. Why might this be the case?
Lead scores are determined primarily by the level of engagement of the prospect. While engagement can be an important factor, it can also represent a false positive. Many times, highly engaged prospects are not serious about buying—they don’t have a budget but are simply curious. The best prospects are often savvy, patient buyers—who don’t necessarily act in a highly engaged fashion.
Sales managers and sales reps know that sometimes it can be worth the effort to “hunt an elephant,” even if it takes a long time. Elephants are traditionally identified as the largest accounts, or Fortune 500 companies. The “diamonds in the rough,” however, are the accounts that would highly value our solution but are not easily identified as good fits. It is suboptimal for sales reps to focus on targets that are highly engaged, but are not a good fit. These prospects may ultimately become customers, but the sales cycles may lag, or the deal may be heavily discounted.
